Category Archives: Theology

Dr. Bruce Ware on four views regarding the providence of god

I count it a privilege to have studied systematic theology under Bruce Ware at Southern Seminary.  At Mars Hill Church in 2007, Ware gave three talks on the subject of the providence of God. (HT: Justin Taylor).   The first talk discusses two views, those of Process Theism and Open Theism, the second that of Arminianism, and the third the view of Reformed Theology (or Calvinism).

Session 1: Uncertain Hands of God and Men: Providence in Process Thought and Open Theism – Bruce Ware

Session 2: Independent Hands of God and Men: Providence in Classic Arminianism – Bruce Ware

Session 3: Coordinated Hands of God and Men: Providence in the Reformed Tradition – Bruce Ware

Ben Witherington on Reimagining Church

Ben Witherington, Professor of New Testament Interpretation at Asbury Theological Seminary, has posted part one of a review of Reimagining Church by Frank Viola.  In part one, Witherington deals with Viola’s assertion that the relationship of the members of the triune Godhead is essentially egalitarian, and therefore relationships within the church are to reflect the Trinity.  Witherington concludes:

So here is where I stress that ontological equality, and functional subordination have always been and always will be compatible, and the blueprint Godhead provides us with a reason to expect that in the church there will be a hierarchial pattern of ordering things. I would hasten to add that it does NOT lead us to expect that this pattern will involve a gender hierarchy. No, it will involve a leader and follower, shepherd and sheep, pastor and congregation, apostle and co-workers hierarchy— something Frank wants to avoid at all costs, seeing it as either inorganic or simply fallen human structures.

Alas, however, it is the divine design, mirroring the functional subordination that indeed has and does exist in the Trinity. When the Bible says ‘honor thy father (and mother)”, it never conceives of a day when somehow the son ever ceases to be a son, ceases to owe respect to the father, ceases to be ordered under the father in these ways. There will always be an ordering in that relation and so a hierarchy. Likewise, there never comes a day when the only begotten Son becomes the Father, or somehow the Father changes roles and becomes the only begotten Son. Equality and indeed mutual love and respect do not in any way necessarily rule out an ordering of relationships, or even functional subordination in such relationships either in the Godhead, or in Christian community. I am afraid that what has affected and infected this discussion is secular notions of equality that assume that equal must mean ‘the same’ in all respects, or ‘the same’ in all functions. But this is not what the Bible either says or suggests.

But, by all means, read the entire review the review for yourself.

Evidence for the influence of the synagogue on the early church

Alan Knox at his blog The Assembling of the Church, discusses Stephen Catto’s Reconstructing the First-Century Synagogue: A Critical Analysis of Current Research.  In his post, Sacred Meals in the SynagogueKnox summarizes Catto’s findings:

Catto describes four “worship practices” that he says were common to first century synagogues. He says that those synagogues practiced 1) sanctity (cleansing or purity), 2) Scripture reading and teaching, 3) Prayer (including hymns), and 4) Sacred meals.

Yes, you read that correctly. Catto suggests that first century synagogue meetings included meals as a form of “worship”. In fact, he points out that many synagogue buildings included dining rooms for the meal.

Books like Pagan Christianity by Frank Viola and George Barna have argued that the early church represented a radical break from the worship practices of 1st century Judaism.  They assert that the early church did not imitate the synagogues’ use of purpose-built buildings, and had a form of worship that was more a spontaneous, free-flowing time of fellowship, in which table fellowship was prominent.  Catto’s book suggests that the fellowship was not distinctive to the NT church.

Knox concludes:

If Catto is correct, and I have much more studying to do before I form an opinion, then eating and drinking together were considered a form of worship to some Jews around the time of the New Testament. Thus, the concept “breaking bread” together would not be a foreign concept to the new church. Certainly, there would be difference between the communal meals of the synagogue and the communal meals of the church. Primarily, for the church, Jesus Christ is both the host and the benefactor of the meal, and the meal provides an outward demonstration of the fellowship that the church possesses because of the indwelling Holy Spirit.

I welcome examining contemporary church pratices in light of the New Testament. But I believe that much of the arguments presented by such writers as Viola and Barna rely on shoddy historical work, and, more importantly, portray a distorted view of the NT church.  Catto’s book, then, is potentially an important corrective.

Eutychus joins the New Covenant Theology website team

Shane Becker of Lifted Veil has kindly asked me to join the team at New Covenant Theology.  The purpose of the site is not to produce new content, but to be a reference where people can find out what’s on other sites dealing with new covenant theology.  Shane explains:

What this site is not:  The aim of this site isn’t to be a repository of NCT material.  It is to contain no articles, blog postings, audio, video, contact lists, etc.  It is to be substanceless.   
 
What this site is:   My aim is to create a portal to point people to NCT articles, blogs, audio, video, contact lists, etc.  I’d like people to know that if they are looking for a particular NCT site or materials they will be able to find it at NewCovenantTheology.org

Although NCT has been a topic of discussion and debate since the 1970s, it is still a relatively little-known approach to biblical theology.  Although NCT is a work in progress, I believe it is essentially correct in its understanding that the New Covenant fulfills and supercedes the Old Covenant.  As a result, the Mosaic Law only applies to the Christian only insofar as it is fulfilled and taken up in the law of Christ.

Keeping up with the discussion and developments in NCT is no easy task, so I am glad Shane has taken on this project, and I hope to play a small part in its success.

The Return of Themelios

I first encountered the theological journal Themelios some 26 years ago.  Over the years, when I have had access to a theological library, I enjoyed browsing it for interesting, well-written articles, and for its book reviews.  I often wanted to subscribe, but always found something more pressing to spend my money on.  A couple of years ago, I think, Themelios went dormant, but it has been revived by The Gospel Coalition, and is edited by D. A. Carson and Carl Trueman.  This in and of itself is good news, but it gets better: the journal is now available online (no more print version) in both PDF and HTML formats.  And it gets better yet: you can read it online or download it for free.  You can check it out at: ThemeliosAlthough it has high scholarly standards, its intended audience is “both theological/religious studies students and pastors.”  As a pastor I can attest to its value, e.g., a helpful and relevant discussion of the church’s mission by Keith Ferdinando, and 38 (!) pages of book reviews.  Shawn Wright, a friend of mine now teaching at Southern Seminary, is the book review editor for the History and Historical Theology category.  Highly recommended.

The limitations of willpower and the value of discipline

I ran across an interesting op-ed piece in the New York Times titled Tighten Your Belt, Strengthen Your Mind, written by two authorities on neuroscience, Sandra Aamodt and Sam Wang.  They present two scientific discoveries that I believe to have interesting implications for Christian discipleship, particularly the value of asceticism and spiritual disciplines.

The first discovery is that people have limited amounts of willpower, so that at any given point in time, exercising self-control in one area tends to diminish one’s ability to exercise control in another:

The brain has a limited capacity for self-regulation, so exerting willpower in one area often leads to backsliding in others. . . . The brain’s store of willpower is depleted when people control their thoughts, feelings or impulses, or when they modify their behavior in pursuit of goals.

That’s the bad news. 

The second finding is that self-control can be developed and increased over time:

The good news, however, is that practice increases willpower capacity, so that in the long run, buying less now may improve our ability to achieve future goals . . .

Neither of these discoveries are particularly earth-shaking.  Perhaps I should call them scientific confirmations.  My point, however, is that I found this article helpful because I have pondered the value of spiritual disciplines in light of the following passage of Scripture:

If with Christ you died to the elemental spirits of the world, why, as if you were still alive in the world, do you submit to regulations— “Do not handle, Do not taste, Do not touch” (referring to things that all perish as they are used)—according to human precepts and teachings? These have indeed an appearance of wisdom in promoting self-made religion and asceticism and severity to the body, but they are of no value in stopping the indulgence of the flesh. (Colossians 2:20-23, English Standard Version)

In light of Paul’s teaching, what value is there in such disciplines as fasting, which might appear to be the application of “asceticism and severity to the body.”  Paul seemed to me to be saying that this kind of activity is useless in controlling the flesh.

On further reflection, Paul may not be saying that exercising self-discipline has no value.  Instead, he is saying that an ascetic lifestyle, which consists of rules which prohibit eating certain kinds of foods, or forbidding marriage (see 1 Timothy 4:1-5), or keeping certain Jewish laws based on clean/unclean distinctions, cannot control the flesh and its passions.  An all-or-nothing approach is incompatible with the way our souls/bodies work.

It may be that long-term, consistent work at self-control may work when it is part of a lifestyle that acknowledges the goodness of our bodies and of creation:

For everything created by God is good, and nothing is to be rejected if it is received with thanksgiving, for it is made holy by the word of God and prayer.  (1 Timothy 4:4-5, ESV)

After all, elsewhere Paul can speak of discipline positively:

But I discipline my body and keep it under control, lest after preaching to others I myself should be disqualified. (1 Corinthians 9:27, ESV)

What I am getting at is that use of spiritual disciplines is not the same as adopting an ascetic lifestyle.  It is the application of various practices which, over time, can be of assistance in our pursuit of becoming more like Jesus Christ.  That is to say, on the one hand, asceticism tends to be self-defeating because our capacity for excercising willpower is limited.  On the other hand, spiritual disciplines can be effective because they take into account the reality that personal change takes place over time.

Contra Legalism

Today I discovered a new (to me, that is) weblog named Against Heresies by Martin Downes.  The latest two posts are on subject of legalism (here and here).  Well said, and sure to be quoted in some future sermon by Eutychus.